Vitamin D Status and Sars-Cov-2 Infection in A Cohort of Renal Transplanted Patients

BACKGROUND AND AIMS Immunomodulatory and anti-inflammatory properties have been hypothesized for native vitamin D (nVD). Very little is reported about nVD and risk of Sars-CoV-2 infection (COV) in renal transplant (RTx). In a cohort of renal transplanted patients (RTxp) we retrospectively evaluated: (i) nVD status in patients with (COV+) and without (COV-) COV infection;(ii) the impact of nVD status on severity of COV. METHOD The study includes 61 COV + in whom nVD status was available in the year before the infection, and 122 COV- matched 1:2 for age (53[45–64]years), gender (M = 60.7%), RTx vintage (7[2–15] years), presence of diabetes (18%), arterial hypertension (85%) and cardiac symptomatic disease (3%). Renal function, 24-h proteinuria and mineral metabolism (MM) parameters were evaluated at 1, 6 and 12 months before COV whereas nVD status was considered as the mean 25-OH-VD levels at the same timepoints. Severity of COV was based on the need for hospitalization (HOSP+: 27/61, 44.3%) and death (D+: 6/61, 9.8%). RESULTS (i) nVD levels were significantly lower in COV + than in COV- (19[12–26] ng/mL and 23[16–30] ng/mL, respectively, P = 0.01). No differences in the other biochemical parameters were found. The COV discriminative power of nVD status was evaluated by ROC curve (AUC 0.61, 95% CI: 0.54–0.68, P = 0.01), with a value of 25-OHVD 23.9 ng/mL showing the best discriminative power (sensibility 72%, specificity 47%). (ii) nVD levels showed a trend towards lower values in HOSP + COV + than HOSP-COV+ (17[8–25] ng/mL versus 20[14–26] ng/mL) and in D + COV + than D-COV+ (13[6–23] ng/mL versus 20[13–26] ng/mL), although these differences did not reach the statistical significance (P = 0.1 and P = 0.2, respectively). CONCLUSION With the limitations of the retrospective nature of the study and the small sample size, our data report that: COV + showed lower nVD levels in the year preceding the infection compared with controls with similar main demographic features and comorbid conditions No differences were found in renal function, proteinuria and other MM parameters between the two groups. No association was found between nVD levels in the year preceding the infection and COV severity.

Covid-19 Vaccine in Kidney Transplanted Patients. is There A Clinical Relevance? An Italian Single Center Experience

BACKGROUND AND AIMS COVID-19 is a life-threatening infection among elderly, comorbid patients or transplanted patients. In our recently published paper (Campise, M.;Alfieri, C.M.;et al. Pathogens 2021, 10, 964), we described our single Centre experience with 82 adult kidney-transplant patients (KTxp) with COVID-19 infection during the previous two pandemic outbreaks: 27 KTxp (first outbreak) and 65 (second). We observed a relatively low and possibly underestimated incidence of infection (5.1%) with a incidence of death almost four times higher than in general population (13%). The availability of COVID-19 vaccines has undoubtedly changed the outcome of the infection in both immunocompetent and immunosuppressed patients. Aim of this second ongoing observational and descriptive study, is to evaluate if the vaccination performed extensively among our KTxp, has modified the incidence and gravity of COVID-19 infection. METHOD Data on KTxp with COVID-19 infection (COV+) from the 29 October 2021 to 31 December 2021 were collected. Particularly, we focused our anthropometric, clinical and therapeutic aspects. In the statistical analyses, continuous variables were expressed as median and interquartile range (25%–75%), and nominal variables were reported as percentage of cases. RESULTS From the 29 October 2021 to the 31 December 2021, 33 KTxp developed COVID-19 infection, 60% were male. Median age was 50[29–58] years. Transplant vintage was 57[27–163] months. Median serum creatinine was 1.30[1.0–1.9] mg/dL and body mass index was 23[21–28] kg/m2. Immunosuppressive schedule included: CNI inhibitors, steroids and mycophenolate (MMF) in 97–90 and 70% of COV + respectively. In 50% of cases native vitamin D supplementation was present, whereas only 30% of cases were treated with renin-angiotensin inhibitors. Only one had insulin dependent diabetes. At the moment of nasopharyngeal swab positivity 64% of COV + had already received three doses of vaccine (Comirnaty (BNT162b2)®) and 30% 2 doses. Only 3% of pts had received a single dose. One patient had refused vaccination for personal reasons. Antigenic nasopharyngeal swab was performed in 70% of COV + and molecular swab in 60%. Thirty-five % of COV + were tested with both methods. The most frequent symptoms were: fever (70%), cough (75%) and headache (40%). In the previous outbreaks dyspnea was present in 33% of cases dropping to 13% in this cohort. Smell and taste alteration were present in 25% and 28% respectively. We did not perform the COVID-19 sequence. But, on the base of the symptoms referred, we are confident that 17 patients had delta variant and remaining had omicron. The first therapeutic approaches were the increase of the daily steroid dosage up to 25 mg (60% of cases) together with MMF temporarily withdrawing in 70% of cases and halving in 10%. Forty % of pts were also treated with monoclonal antibodies (Ronapreve ®) upon infectious disease specialist evaluation. During the first two outbreaks, hospitalization was necessary in 45% of cases, and 13% of pts died. In the present cohort only 10% of patients required oxygen support and hospitalization. Nobody died. CONCLUSION Although very preliminary, our results indicate that the vaccination campaign has noticeably ameliorated the incidence, the clinical presentation and the outcome of COVID-19 in KTxp. This comforting data should further sensitize the medical community on vaccination counseling in KTxp as soon as possible. Study with higher number of patients are needed to further clarify the individual response on antibody production and sensitivity to this still life-threatening infection.

How Vaccinations Changed the Outcome of COVID-19 Infections in Kidney Transplant Patients: Single-Center Experience.

Kidney transplant recipients are a vulnerable population at risk of a life-threatening COVID-19 infection with an incidence of death four-times higher than in the general population. The availability of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines has dramatically changed the fate of this infection also within this fragile population. Transplanted patients have an impaired immunological response also to mRNA vaccines. In March 2021, however, we started a vaccination campaign. These preliminary results show that both the incidence of death and of hospitalization dropped from 13% to 2.4% and from 45% to 12.5% compared to the previous outbreaks reported by our group. In univariate analysis, two variables were associated with an increased risk of hospitalization: older age and dyspnea (p = 0.023, p < 0.0001, respectively). In multivariate analysis, dyspnea (p < 0.0001) and mycophenolate therapy (p = 0.003) were independently associated with the risk of hospitalization. The association was even stronger when the two variables were combined (p < 0.0001). Vaccinations did not reduce the incidence of COVID-19 infections among our transplanted patients, but provided certain protection that was associated with a significantly better outcome for this infection.

Vitamin D Status and SARS-CoV-2 Infection in a Cohort of Kidney Transplanted Patients.

BACKGROUND: Recently the protective role of 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) against viral infections has been hypothesized. We evaluated the association between vitamin D status and SARS-CoV-2 infection susceptibility and severity in a cohort of kidney transplanted patients (KTxp). METHODS: A total of 61 KTxp with SARS-CoV-2 infection (COV+) were matched with 122 healthy KTxp controls (COV-). Main biochemical parameters at 1, 6, and 12 months before SARS-CoV-2 infection were recorded. Vitamin D status was considered as the mean of two 25(OH)D measures obtained 6 ± 2 months apart during the last year. The severity of SARS-CoV-2 infection was based on the need for hospitalization (HOSP+) and death (D+). RESULTS: 25(OH)D levels were lower in COV+ than in controls [19(12-26) vs. 23(17-31) ng/mL, p = 0.01]. No differences among the other biochemical parameters were found. The SARS-CoV-2 infection discriminative power of 25(OH)D was evaluated by ROC-curve (AUC 0.61, 95% CI 0.5-0.7, p = 0.01). 25(OH)D was not significantly different between HOSP+ and HOSP- [17(8-25) vs. 20(15-26) ng/mL, p = 0.19] and between D+ and D- [14(6-23) vs. 20(14-26) ng/mL, p = 0.22] and had no significant correlation with disease length. CONCLUSIONS: During the year preceding the infection, 25(OH)D levels were lower in COV+ KTxp in comparison with controls matched for demographic features and comorbidities. No significant association between vitamin D status and SARS-CoV-2 infection related outcomes was found.

COVID-19 Infection in Kidney Transplant Patients: An Italian One Year Single Centre Experience.

COVID-19 is a life-threatening infection among elderly patients, comorbid patients, or transplanted patients. Lombardy (region of Italy), accounts for 786,324 cases as of 21 April 2021. We retrospectively describe our single Centre experience in 82 adult kidney-transplant patients with COVID-19 infection during two pandemic outbreaks: 27 (first outbreak) and 65 (second outbreak). Thirty-seven patients were hospitalized (HP) and sixty-five were home managed (HM). Infection presented with fever (80%), cough (51%), and dyspnea (33%). HP were older (60 ± 11 vs. 50 ± 14 years, p = 0.001), had more severe respiratory symptoms (dyspnea 62.1%, p < 0.0001-cough 67% p = 0.008), and a longer length of disease (30 ± 28 vs. 21 ± 10, p = 0.04). The incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) was 29.7% (p < 0.0001). Steroid dosage was increased in 66% of patients (p = 0.0003), while calcineurin inhibitors were reduced by up to one third in 45% of cases, p < 0.0001. Eleven patients died (13%). HM patients recovered completely without sequelae. In the overall cohort, AKI development (p = 0.006 OR 50.4 CI 95% 3.0-836) and age (p = 0.04 OR 1.1 CI 95% 1.0-1.2) were the most important factors influencing the probability of death during the infection. Although we report a relatively low incidence of infection (5.1%) the incidence of death is almost four times higher than it is in the general population.